CVE-2018-11759 HIGH

CVE-2018-11759 exposure check for Tomcat Jk Connector

Check whether public-facing assets expose Apache Tomcat Jk Connector signals related to CVE-2018-11759. Severity: HIGH.

From CVE Record to External Exposure

The Apache Web Server (httpd) specific code that normalised the requested path before matching it to the URI-worker map in Apache Tomcat JK (mod_jk) Connector 1.2.0 to 1.2.44 did not handle some edge cases correctly. If only a sub-set of the URLs supported by Tomcat were exposed via httpd, then it was possible for a specially constructed request to expose application functionality through the reverse proxy that was not intended for clients accessing the application via the reverse proxy. It was also possible in some configurations for a specially constructed request to bypass the access controls configured in httpd. While there is some overlap between this issue and CVE-2018-1323, they are not identical.

Tomcat Jk Connector vulnerability should be triaged by matching the affected vendor and product to live, internet-facing assets rather than treating the CVE as an abstract feed item. ThreatPort focuses on the first question that budget-constrained IT leaders and CISOs ask: what can an outside observer find today, how severe is it, and what should be fixed first?

Known Exploitation Record

Known ransomware campaign use
Not recorded
EPSS exploitation probability
90.65% (100p)
CVSS base score
7.5 (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N)
Disclosed
2018-10-31
Weakness type
CWE-22

Source: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog and FIRST.org EPSS.

What ThreatPort Checks

Identify externally reachable services that appear related to Apache Tomcat Jk Connector.
Map detected technologies to CVE-2018-11759, severity context, and practical remediation priority.
Check TLS, DNS, headers, exposed panels, stale endpoints, and service fingerprints from a public attacker perspective.
Produce a concise scorecard first, then unlock deeper AI pentest evidence and PDF reporting when remediation planning begins.

The output is intentionally practical: ownership clues, risk context, remediation hints, and repeatable evidence that can be shared with technical teams or leadership. It is not positioned as magic compliance automation or a replacement for human security judgment.

Lean security teams rarely need another broad vulnerability list. They need to know whether an exposed endpoint, an expired certificate, a weak DNS setting, or a CVE-linked service is likely to affect the systems they actually run. ThreatPort scans from the outside in, ranks what it finds by real reachability rather than raw CVSS, and hands back evidence a team can act on the same day.

Route-Specific Evidence Profile

CVE-2018-11759 affects Apache Tomcat Jk Connector, a CWE-22 weakness. Disclosed 2018-10-31. This page exists to answer one question: is anything you own externally reachable and running it.

Assets This Page Should Care About

Public domains Subdomains Externally reachable web apps TLS endpoints DNS records

Signals Worth Prioritizing

Forgotten subdomains
Weak DNS or email controls
Outdated services
Risky headers

What Should Be Reviewed First in This Context?

For teams running Apache Tomcat Jk Connector, the first step is to validate internet-facing assets with business relevance instead of producing a generic vulnerability list.

Forgotten subdomains
Weak DNS or email controls
Outdated services
Risky headers

Action Checklist

  1. Confirm whether Tomcat Jk Connector is present on any public domain, subdomain, API, or admin surface.
  2. Prioritize HIGH exposure only when the affected service is reachable or business-critical.
  3. Patch, disable, isolate, or put compensating controls in front of the affected service.
  4. Re-scan after remediation to capture before-and-after evidence for technical teams or leadership.

Context-Aware Next Fixes

  1. Verify ownership of exposed assets
  2. Close unnecessary public services
  3. Remediate the highest-confidence exposed findings first, then re-scan to prove closure.

Useful evidence for this context usually maps to ISO 27001, SOC 2, vendor security reviews. ThreatPort keeps the language cautious: this is operational security evidence, not a legal certification or a guarantee that every auditor will accept a generated report without review.